<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The nature of new groups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lizziejackson.com/2007/08/15/the-royal-society-of-arts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lizziejackson.com/2007/08/15/the-royal-society-of-arts/</link>
	<description>Research, consultancy and training on digital social life</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: lizziejackson</title>
		<link>http://lizziejackson.com/2007/08/15/the-royal-society-of-arts/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>lizziejackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizziejackson.com/2007/08/15/the-royal-society-of-arts/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Hi James,

I agree with you - that lurkers are just as loyal as performers. I don't think service providers and site builders do enough 'fairground barkering' as I call it, calling out to lurkers and making them feel included. 

Thanks for the reference...I'll take a look!

Lizzie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi James,</p>
<p>I agree with you - that lurkers are just as loyal as performers. I don&#8217;t think service providers and site builders do enough &#8216;fairground barkering&#8217; as I call it, calling out to lurkers and making them feel included. </p>
<p>Thanks for the reference&#8230;I&#8217;ll take a look!</p>
<p>Lizzie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hickie</title>
		<link>http://lizziejackson.com/2007/08/15/the-royal-society-of-arts/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hickie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizziejackson.com/2007/08/15/the-royal-society-of-arts/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, Rong-An Shang et al did some research on brand loyalty of participants in the Apple computer virtual community, and they found that lurkers in this community developed greater brand loyalty to Apple than those who actively posted.  This seems a finding that it would be useful to research further, to either confirm or deny their findings.  I don't know if anyone is aware of similar research findings already produced?

Reference: Rong-An Shang, Yu-Chen Chen and Hsueh-Jung Liao (2006) 'The value of participation in virtual consumer communities on brand loyalty', Internet Research, 16(4), p398-418.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, Rong-An Shang et al did some research on brand loyalty of participants in the Apple computer virtual community, and they found that lurkers in this community developed greater brand loyalty to Apple than those who actively posted.  This seems a finding that it would be useful to research further, to either confirm or deny their findings.  I don&#8217;t know if anyone is aware of similar research findings already produced?</p>
<p>Reference: Rong-An Shang, Yu-Chen Chen and Hsueh-Jung Liao (2006) &#8216;The value of participation in virtual consumer communities on brand loyalty&#8217;, Internet Research, 16(4), p398-418.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dodds</title>
		<link>http://lizziejackson.com/2007/08/15/the-royal-society-of-arts/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dodds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lizziejackson.com/2007/08/15/the-royal-society-of-arts/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I think the 90/9/1 rule tends to be pretty good - 90% of people lurk and never comment/act, 9% comment once or occassionally while 1% are very active.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the 90/9/1 rule tends to be pretty good - 90% of people lurk and never comment/act, 9% comment once or occassionally while 1% are very active.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
